The trade tariff measures implemented by Trump have disrupted the balance of international financial markets, and the intention of the measure and its impact have sparked widespread debate. The risk of economic downturn has increased, relevant laws and regulations have been challenged, and different political factions have successively expressed their positions, making the situation even more tense.

Tariffs hit the market hard and cause protests

Recently, the trade tariff policies implemented by Trump have been like a bombshell, causing a significant impact on the financial market. Global stock markets have experienced drastic fluctuations, and leaders of various countries have generally expressed strong dissatisfaction. The rise in tariffs has led to a significant increase in international trade costs and hindered corporate profits. According to relevant data, since the implementation of the policy, the import and export trade volume of some industries in the United States has decreased significantly, and the downward pressure on the economy has continued to increase.

Exploring the “original moment” policy cause

In February this year, President Trump just entered the White House and immediately started the implementation phase of the tariff policy. He used IEEPA for the first time and launched the first round of tariff actions against Mexico, Canada and China. The IEEPA grants the president the power to implement comprehensive supervision of specific financial transactions in an emergency situation. President Trump claimed that this was a reasonable basis for imposing additional tariffs on the grounds that illegal immigration and drug issues posed a “special threat”.

Historical precedents may become reference

Nixon once implemented tariff measures on imported goods under the Trade with the Enemy Act, with the purpose of dealing with imbalance in the balance of payments. This approach may have touched Trump, which prompted him to adopt a similar strategy. Trump has repeatedly used tariffs to claim that his purpose is to promote the return of US manufacturing industry to the country, but in essence it is to increase federal fiscal revenue. This series of actions has sparked public doubts about whether Nixon and Trump’s policies have logical commonalities.

Paper company’s lawsuit focus

Emily Ray Paper Company put forward two key points in its litigation documents. First, the company pointed out that the tariffs imposed by President Trump under the IEEPA in February did not have positive effects on the resolution of the opioid crisis in the United States. Second, the company stressed that the real purpose of implementing these tariffs widely is not what the government claims to be. This phenomenon not only reflects the company’s doubts and opposition to the current policies, but also exposes the shortcomings in the policies.

Different forces have different attitudes

The New Civil Liberties Union (NCLA) expressed support for the paper company’s lawsuit, which advocated reducing federal intervention in the economy and civil liberties. Meanwhile, both California Democratic parties and Florida Republican opposition have objected to Trump’s tariff policy. Trump counterattacked this, targeting the traditional elites such as the Koch brothers, which led to the continuous escalation of conflicts between all parties.

New survey adds variables

As the article was written to an end, Trump’s team launched the No. 232 investigation plan for the semiconductor field. This move has many similarities with the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, reflecting their attempts to circumvent Congressian constraints and enhance personal decision-making power. However, this move may arouse doubts and opposition to procedural fairness, and its specific impact cannot be accurately predicted at present.

The future direction of the trade tariff policy implemented by Trump is still unclear. As for whether this policy will cause more controversy and litigation, there is no clear conclusion yet. We sincerely invite readers to share your views in the comment area and like and forward this article.

Posted in

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *